AdsPower vs MoreLogin
Automation tools, free seats and mobile add-ons.
Customize this comparisonCapabilities are based on published sources. Conditional support and unverified claims are shown separately; no installed-product test is implied.
Swipe the table horizontally to compare all columns.
| Comparison |  AdsPowerSource review · no Lab test |  MoreLoginSource review · no Lab test |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Antidetect browser | Browser + cloud phone |
| Consider it for | Teams choosing between visual workflows and code-driven profile management. | Small teams evaluating a shared free workspace before scaling. |
| Paid pricing & billing | USD 9 / month · Professional · 10-profile option. 10-profile option, no extra members; billed every 30 days. Annual offer: $54 upfront. Profile and member selections change the quote.[16] | USD 9 / month · Pro · 10-profile option. Pro starts with a 10-profile option. Extra users and cloud-phone runtime are separate price dimensions.[7] |
| Free access & limits | 2 permanent profiles; one administrator, no extra members. A separate 7-day trial is advertised.[16] | 2 permanent profiles and 2 users.[7] |
| API subscription and limits | Free included since the March 2026 update; older API docs still require a paid plan. Pricing lists Professional 120, Business 300 and Enterprise 600 requests/minute. Free-plan rate is not specified there. Member permissions still apply. · 2026-09-12[16][17][18] | Local API appears in all three columns: Free, Pro and Custom. No numeric request-rate limit is given on the reviewed pricing page. Requires the local client and matching API configuration. · 2026-09-12[7] |
| Before you choose | Start with a small workflow: API limits, member seats and automation quotas can matter more than the profile count. | Cloud-phone usage has its own billing rules. Browser profile subscriptions are not a quote for mobile runtime. |
| Windows | Documented · The linked official source documents Windows.[7] | Documented · The linked official source documents Windows. Windows 10+ x64 and macOS 12.6.1+; reviewed text does not specify Linux distribution limits.[3] |
| macOS | Documented · The linked official source documents macOS.[7] | Documented · The linked official source documents macOS. Windows 10+ x64 and macOS 12.6.1+; reviewed text does not specify Linux distribution limits.[3] |
| Linux | Documented · The linked official source documents Linux.[7] | Documented · The linked official source documents Linux. Windows 10+ x64 and macOS 12.6.1+; reviewed text does not specify Linux distribution limits.[3] |
| Chromium | Documented · The linked official source documents Chromium.[8] | Documented · The linked official source documents Chromium. The browser-type field lists Chrome and Firefox, rather than only User-Agent presets.[4] |
| Firefox | Documented · The linked official source documents Firefox.[8] | Documented · The linked official source documents Firefox. The browser-type field lists Chrome and Firefox, rather than only User-Agent presets.[4] |
| API | Documented · The linked official source documents API. Members need API permission; plan and version eligibility must be checked.[9][10] | Documented · The linked official source documents API.[5] |
| Playwright | Documented · The linked official source documents Playwright. Requires Local API and a matching browser core/driver; combinations were not run-tested.[11] | Not verified · Not established in the reviewed sources. Not verified does not mean unsupported. The review is limited to the listed sources; no installation or API execution test was run.[5] |
| Puppeteer | Documented · The linked official source documents Puppeteer. Requires Local API and a matching browser core/driver; combinations were not run-tested.[11] | Not verified · Not established in the reviewed sources. Not verified does not mean unsupported. The review is limited to the listed sources; no installation or API execution test was run.[5] |
| Selenium | Documented · The linked official source documents Selenium. Requires Local API and a matching browser core/driver; combinations were not run-tested.[11] | Not verified · Not established in the reviewed sources. Not verified does not mean unsupported. The review is limited to the listed sources; no installation or API execution test was run.[5] |
| RPA | Documented · The linked official source documents RPA. RPA and RPA Plus have separate quotas and pricing.[12] | Documented · The linked official source documents RPA.[5] |
| MCP | Documented · The linked official source documents MCP. Requires a running AdsPower client and a separately configured MCP server.[13] | Not verified · Not established in the reviewed sources. Not verified does not mean unsupported. The review is limited to the listed sources; no installation or API execution test was run.[5] |
| Team | Documented · The linked official source documents Team.[14] | Documented · The linked official source documents Team.[5] |
| Local profiles | Conditional · Local profiles has the following documented limitation. Local data storage does not establish fully offline profiles or independence from cloud metadata.[14] | Not verified · Not established in the reviewed sources. Not verified does not mean unsupported. The review is limited to the listed sources; no installation or API execution test was run.[5] |
| Cloud sync | Documented · The linked official source documents Cloud sync. Synchronization scope depends on settings; encryption was not tested.[14] | Documented · The previously reviewed official source lists Cloud sync.[6] |
| Cloud phone | Conditional · Cloud phone has the following documented limitation. The link points to the separate DuoPlus product, not a native AdsPower cloud phone.[7] | Documented · The linked official source documents Cloud phone. Check browser and cloud-phone quotas and billing separately.[5] |
| Open-source core | Not verified · Not established in the reviewed sources. Not verified does not mean unsupported. The review is limited to the listed sources; no installation or API execution test was run.[15] | Not verified · Not established in the reviewed sources. Not verified does not mean unsupported. The review is limited to the listed sources; no installation or API execution test was run.[5] |
| Research Score | Not assessed | Not assessed |
| BrowserCheck Lab | Not tested | Not tested |
Unknown is not a negative result. Prices use their original currencies; no currency conversion or annual-to-monthly blending is applied.
Measured reference: native Chrome
Chrome 152.0.7977.83 · macOS 26.5.2 · Apple M5 Pro · 48 GiB · 2026-09-12
Two fresh Chrome profiles on one device, with no account or extensions. The test script supplied no proxy or fingerprint overrides. A visible browser window was controlled through CDP and fully closed between runs. BrowserCheck ran from a local production Worker preview; this is a reference for this setup only.
| Measurement | Observed result |
|---|---|
| Unchanged environment values after reopening A | 10/10 |
| Cookie | Retained in A 10/10 · Absent in B 10/10 |
| localStorage | Retained in A 10/10 · Absent in B 10/10 |
| IndexedDB | Retained in A 10/10 · Absent in B 10/10 |
| Cleanup | All test markers absent; unrelated preference retained |
Same-day short sessions on one device do not establish long-term reliability. The page reports a reduced browser version and generic WebGL renderer; full installed version was recorded separately. RAM, CPU, launch duration, browser updates and other websites were not measured.
AdsPower, GoLogin and Multilogin: awaiting tests
No installed-product runs have been recorded for these three browsers. Their results, versions and measurements remain unpublished until tests can be run with signed-in clients. The Chrome reference cannot be used to rank them.
When to consider AdsPower
Teams choosing between visual workflows and code-driven profile management.
Start with a small workflow: API limits, member seats and automation quotas can matter more than the profile count.
Test your environmentWhen to consider MoreLogin
Small teams evaluating a shared free workspace before scaling.
Cloud-phone usage has its own billing rules. Browser profile subscriptions are not a quote for mobile runtime.
Test your environmentSources & commercial relationships
Vendor statements are labelled. No paid placement or affiliate tracking links in this directory. No overall detection score is assigned.
Source reviews & hands-on tests
A source review is not a hands-on test. Research scores remain unassessed until the rubric is completed.
Read our methodology →Curated comparisons
AdsPower vs GoLogin
Compare visual automation, cross-device access and free-plan limits.
AdsPower vs Multilogin
Compare browser automation, profile limits and cloud-phone billing.
AdsPower vs Dolphin Anty
Compare team access, automation features and profile allowances.
Multilogin vs GoLogin
Compare cloud phones, Android access and browser profile quotas.
Multilogin vs Octo Browser
Separate the mobile bundle from desktop profile capacity.
GoLogin vs MoreLogin
Android access and cloud phones are different products.
Kameleo vs Multilogin
Concurrent browsers versus profile-based bundles.
Incogniton vs GoLogin
Check the free allowance after the introductory period.
DICloak vs AdsPower
Free profile counts only make sense beside daily quotas.
BitBrowser vs AdsPower
Compare entry quotas and automation entitlements.
Hidemyacc vs MoreLogin
Compare session recovery, automation and cloud-phone support.
GeeLark vs Multilogin
Keep phone minutes separate from browser profiles.